[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250816003013.e12ecb8f2dc45e7f934ff281@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 00:30:13 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>, wang lian <lianux.mm@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, David Hildenbrand
<david@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Dev
Jain <dev.jain@....com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, Vlastimil Babka
<vbabka@...e.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Suren Baghdasaryan
<surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Shuah Khan
<shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] selftests/mm: reimplement is_backed_by_thp()
with more precise check
I hit a large reject. Can you please redo against next mm-new?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists