[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C8AA817C-E687-4656-AFB0-1729CB711D66@nvidia.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 07:43:54 -0400
From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>, wang lian <lianux.mm@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] selftests/mm: reimplement is_backed_by_thp() with
more precise check
On 16 Aug 2025, at 3:30, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I hit a large reject. Can you please redo against next mm-new?
Sure.
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists