linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49395077-1af8-42c2-09bd-b87ed9d4a41b@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 11:43:39 +0800
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: kemal <kmal@...k.li>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry



On 2025/8/18 5:14, kemal wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>> Since commit a70e9f647f50 ("entry: Split generic entry into generic
>> exception and syscall entry") split the generic entry into generic irq
>> entry and generic syscall entry, it is time to convert arm64 to use
>> the generic irq entry. And ARM64 will be completely converted to generic
>> entry in the upcoming patch series.
> 
> I was trying to implement syscall user dispatch support for ARM64,
> which is simply about converting arm64 to use the generic entry, and I
> stumbled upon your patchset on Google. So I decided to write the code
> for generic syscall entry on top of this patchset, and the code seems
> to be working. (It boots, and SUD works, but I didn't test ptrace etc.)
> 
> Should I send the code here?

I have implement the generic syscall entry in v5 and will completely
convert arm64 to generic entry in the upcoming patch series.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2024/12/6/609