[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e412cd01-cf76-4486-a475-74b255aff4ab@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 17:25:01 +0100
From: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@....com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com,
sstabellini@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, mbenes@...e.cz,
broonie@...nel.org, anshuman.khandual@....com, ryan.roberts@....com,
chenl311@...natelecom.cn, liaochang1@...wei.com, kristina.martsenko@....com,
leitao@...ian.org, ardb@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/8] arm64: entry: Refactor preempt_schedule_irq()
check code
Hello,
On 15/08/2025 04:06, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> To align the structure of the code with irqentry_exit_cond_resched()
> from the generic entry code, hoist the need_irq_preemption()
> and IS_ENABLED() check earlier. And different preemption check functions
> are defined based on whether dynamic preemption is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
> ---
That looks good to me as well, thanks for the changes !
Reviewed-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists