[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250818192800.621408-1-briannorris@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 12:27:37 -0700
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] genirq/test: Platform/architecture fixes
The new kunit tests at kernel/irq/irq_test.c were primarily tested on
x86_64, with QEMU and with ARCH=um builds. Naturally, there are other
architectures that throw complications in the mix, with various CPU
hotplug and IRQ implementation choices.
Guenter has been dutifully noticing and reporting these errors, in
places like:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/b4cf04ea-d398-473f-bf11-d36643aa50dd@roeck-us.net/
I hope I've addressed all the failures, but it's hard to tell when I
don't have cross-compilers and QEMU setups for all of these
architectures.
I've tested what I could on arm, powerpc, x86_64, and um ARCH.
This series is based on David's patch for these tests:
[PATCH] genirq/test: Fix depth tests on architectures with NOREQUEST by default.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250816094528.3560222-2-davidgow@google.com/
Brian Norris (6):
genirq/test: Select IRQ_DOMAIN
genirq/test: Factor out fake-virq setup
genirq/test: Fail early if we can't request an IRQ
genirq/test: Skip managed-affinity tests with !SPARSE_IRQ
genirq/test: Drop CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_MIGRATION assumptions
genirq/test: Ensure CPU 1 is online for hotplug test
kernel/irq/Kconfig | 1 +
kernel/irq/irq_test.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
--
2.51.0.rc1.167.g924127e9c0-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists