[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250818192632.2982223-3-jm@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:26:31 -0500
From: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
To: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J
. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Bryan
Brattlof <bb@...com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: ti: Allow all silicon revisions to support OPPs
More silicon revisions are being defined for AM62x, AM62Px, and AM62ax
SoCs. These silicon may also support currently establishes OPPs, so remove
the revision limitation in ti-cpufreq and thus determine if an OPP applies
with speed grade efuse parsing.
Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
index f7be09dc63e3..90c896d02649 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
@@ -311,9 +311,9 @@ static struct ti_cpufreq_soc_data am3517_soc_data = {
};
static const struct soc_device_attribute k3_cpufreq_soc[] = {
- { .family = "AM62X", .revision = "SR1.0" },
- { .family = "AM62AX", .revision = "SR1.0" },
- { .family = "AM62PX", .revision = "SR1.0" },
+ { .family = "AM62X", },
+ { .family = "AM62AX", },
+ { .family = "AM62PX", },
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists