linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] mm/selftests: Fix split_huge_page_test failure on systems with 64KB page size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250818022151.c2haj2njkmsgbuak@master>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 02:21:51 +0000
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Giant Sand Fans <rampxxxx@...il.com>,
	Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
	Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@...ux.ibm.com>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Liam.Howlett@...cle.com" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
	"lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com" <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
	"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
	"pfalcato@...e.de" <pfalcato@...e.de>,
	"ziy@...dia.com" <ziy@...dia.com>,
	"baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com" <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	"npache@...hat.com" <npache@...hat.com>,
	"ryan.roberts@....com" <ryan.roberts@....com>,
	"dev.jain@....com" <dev.jain@....com>,
	"baohua@...nel.org" <baohua@...nel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"donettom@...ux.ibm.com" <donettom@...ux.ibm.com>,
	"ritesh.list@...il.com" <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] mm/selftests: Fix split_huge_page_test failure on
 systems with 64KB page size

On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 10:07:01AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
[...]
>> 
>> Is it possible to have some defines here instead plain numbers?
>> Thanks
>
>I assume we should look into using kselftest_harness as a separate effort, so
>we can avoid this manual test calculation completely. I'm afraid even using
>defines will not make this significntly more readable.
>

Agree

>-- 
>Cheers
>
>David / dhildenb

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me