[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf71e138-656d-4740-a5e9-43b4460147ca@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 09:32:06 -0500
From: Mark Tinguely <mark.tinguely@...cle.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, Joseph Qi
<joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] : [PATCH] ocfs2: remove unnecessary NULL check in
ocfs2_grab_folios()
On 8/19/25 4:41 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch complains that checking "folios" for NULL doesn't make sense
> because it has already been dereferenced at this point. Really passing a
> NULL "folios" pointer to ocfs2_grab_folios() doesn't make sense, and
> fortunately none of the callers do that. Delete the unnecessary NULL
> check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> index 821cb7874685..162711cc5b20 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
> @@ -6928,8 +6928,7 @@ static int ocfs2_grab_folios(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, loff_t end,
>
> out:
> if (ret != 0) {
> - if (folios)
> - ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios);
> + ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios);
> numfolios = 0;
> }
>
Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <mark.tinguely@...cle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists