[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKRG39hyvDJcN2G7@stanley.mountain>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 12:41:51 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ocfs2: remove unnecessary NULL check in ocfs2_grab_folios()
Smatch complains that checking "folios" for NULL doesn't make sense
because it has already been dereferenced at this point. Really passing a
NULL "folios" pointer to ocfs2_grab_folios() doesn't make sense, and
fortunately none of the callers do that. Delete the unnecessary NULL
check.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
---
fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
index 821cb7874685..162711cc5b20 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
@@ -6928,8 +6928,7 @@ static int ocfs2_grab_folios(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, loff_t end,
out:
if (ret != 0) {
- if (folios)
- ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios);
+ ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios);
numfolios = 0;
}
--
2.47.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists