[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a71bb77d-6725-4c79-b817-7c8e4b0c7612@163.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 22:45:23 +0800
From: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Cc: lpieralisi@...nel.org, kwilczynski@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
jingoohan1@...il.com, robh@...nel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: endpoint: Use common PCI host bridge APIs for
finding the capabilities
On 2025/8/19 22:14, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 11:25:15PM GMT, Hans Zhang wrote:
>> Use the PCI core is now exposing generic macros for the host bridges to
>> search for the PCIe capabilities, make use of them in the DWC EP driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>
>
> Please send it together with the dependent series.
>
Dear Mani,
I'll send it out right away later.
Best regards,
Hans
>
>> ---
>> - Submissions based on the following patches:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20250607161405.808585-1-18255117159@163.com/
>>
>> Recently, I checked the code and found that there are still some areas that can be further optimized.
>> The above series of patches has been around for a long time, so I'm sending this one out for review
>> as a separate patch.
>> ---
>> .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 39 +++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
>> index 0ae54a94809b..9f1880cc1925 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
>> @@ -69,37 +69,26 @@ void dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(struct dw_pcie *pci, enum pci_barno bar)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar);
>>
>> -static u8 __dw_pcie_ep_find_next_cap(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
>> - u8 cap_ptr, u8 cap)
>> +static int dw_pcie_ep_read_cfg(void *priv, u8 func_no, int where, int size, u32 *val)
>> {
>> - u8 cap_id, next_cap_ptr;
>> - u16 reg;
>> -
>> - if (!cap_ptr)
>> - return 0;
>> -
>> - reg = dw_pcie_ep_readw_dbi(ep, func_no, cap_ptr);
>> - cap_id = (reg & 0x00ff);
>> -
>> - if (cap_id > PCI_CAP_ID_MAX)
>> - return 0;
>> -
>> - if (cap_id == cap)
>> - return cap_ptr;
>> + struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = priv;
>> +
>> + if (size == 4)
>> + *val = dw_pcie_ep_readl_dbi(ep, func_no, where);
>> + else if (size == 2)
>> + *val = dw_pcie_ep_readw_dbi(ep, func_no, where);
>> + else if (size == 1)
>> + *val = dw_pcie_ep_readb_dbi(ep, func_no, where);
>> + else
>> + return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER;
>>
>> - next_cap_ptr = (reg & 0xff00) >> 8;
>> - return __dw_pcie_ep_find_next_cap(ep, func_no, next_cap_ptr, cap);
>> + return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
>> }
>>
>> static u8 dw_pcie_ep_find_capability(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, u8 cap)
>> {
>> - u8 next_cap_ptr;
>> - u16 reg;
>> -
>> - reg = dw_pcie_ep_readw_dbi(ep, func_no, PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST);
>> - next_cap_ptr = (reg & 0x00ff);
>> -
>> - return __dw_pcie_ep_find_next_cap(ep, func_no, next_cap_ptr, cap);
>> + return PCI_FIND_NEXT_CAP_TTL(dw_pcie_ep_read_cfg, PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST,
>> + cap, ep, func_no);
>> }
>>
>> /**
>>
>> base-commit: 19272b37aa4f83ca52bdf9c16d5d81bdd1354494
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists