linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/15] ARM: dts: ls1021a-qds: Rename node name at45db021d@0 to flash@0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d24ee864-aabd-4960-a9b3-42f80774e2bd@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 09:17:50 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] ARM: dts: ls1021a-qds: Rename node name
 at45db021d@0 to flash@0

On 18/08/2025 22:48, Frank Li wrote:
> Rename node name at45db021d@0 to flash@0 to fix below CHECK_DTBS warnings:
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-qds.dtb: at45db021d@0 (atmel,at45db021d): Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'spi-cpha', 'spi-cpol' were unexpected)
> 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mtd/atmel,dataflash.yaml#
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-qds.dts | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-qds.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-qds.dts
> index 227a886ca6825465cfbb404e93c8f5e9977b1321..8bc8ff2e3b03d6eeb43d79fe0555842536ab735c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-qds.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/ls/ls1021a-qds.dts
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ &dspi0 {
>  	bus-num = <0>;
>  	status = "okay";
>  
> -	dspiflash: at45db021d@0 {
> +	dspiflash: flash@0 {
Don't do this node by node. Squash your patches.

Best regards,
Krzysztof