[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKQ4QSAqT7OLIBf1@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 09:39:29 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, soc@...ts.linux.dev,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: exclude defconfig from ARM64 PORT
On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 11:08:04PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Patches for the arm64 defconfig are supposed to be sent to the
> SoC maintainers (e.g. a change in the generic arm64 defconfig
> required for Rockchip devices should be send to Heiko Stübner
> as he is listed as maintainer for "ARM/Rockchip SoC support")
> and not the ARM64 PORT maintainers.
>
> While we cannot easily describe this in MAINTAINERS, we can at
> least stop it from giving false information and make it behave
> the same way as for the MAINTAINERS file itself (which basically
> has the same rules), so that it just outputs the LKML for the
> ARM64 defconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index daf520a13bdf6a991c0160a96620f40308c29ee0..b6466a628381bf40ebcf7e3638ec65fabf6ad357 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -3667,6 +3667,7 @@ F: drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-guest/
> F: drivers/virt/coco/pkvm-guest/
> F: tools/testing/selftests/arm64/
> X: arch/arm64/boot/dts/
> +X: arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists