linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: exclude defconfig from ARM64 PORT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aKQ5V8iWQ7tqSnq9@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 09:44:07 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, soc@...ts.linux.dev,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: exclude defconfig from ARM64 PORT

On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 11:08:04PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Patches for the arm64 defconfig are supposed to be sent to the
> SoC maintainers (e.g. a change in the generic arm64 defconfig
> required for Rockchip devices should be send to Heiko Stübner
> as he is listed as maintainer for "ARM/Rockchip SoC support")
> and not the ARM64 PORT maintainers.
> 
> While we cannot easily describe this in MAINTAINERS, we can at
> least stop it from giving false information and make it behave
> the same way as for the MAINTAINERS file itself (which basically
> has the same rules), so that it just outputs the LKML for the
> ARM64 defconfig.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>