[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKUy_1IYtlKtLEbK@archie.me>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 09:29:19 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux bcachefs <linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: bcachefs: Add explicit title for idle
work design doc
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 09:08:22PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > -Idle/background work classes design doc:
> > +Idle/background work classes desiderata
>
> .....
> what's going on with that spelling?
I'm just suggesting a better title, though. Should I keep it or revert back
to design doc?
Confused...
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists