lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33d4f923-250b-48f0-b5f5-664f09a2edf5@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 18:18:47 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux bcachefs <linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: bcachefs: Add explicit title for idle work
 design doc

Hi,

On 8/19/25 5:22 PM, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Commit 9e260e4590e044 ("docs: bcachefs: idle work scheduling design doc")
> adds design doc (desiderata) for idle work scheduling, but missed
> explicit title, causing its two section headings to be toctree entries
> instead.
> 
> Add the title.
> 
> Fixes: 9e260e4590e0 ("docs: bcachefs: idle work scheduling design doc")
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst
> index 59a332509dcd97..30f2844c3d9e5e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> -Idle/background work classes design doc:
> +Idle/background work classes desiderata
> +=======================================

I agree with the underline change and tested it. However, I don't care
for the change in the wording.

>  
>  Right now, our behaviour at idle isn't ideal, it was designed for servers that
>  would be under sustained load, to keep pending work at a "medium" level, to
> 
> base-commit: 37c52167b007d9d0bb8c5ed53dd6efc4969a1356

Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>


-- 
~Randy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ