[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e97983fd-b6ee-403a-87c7-53ff37468551@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 14:37:57 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Make x86@...nel.org a list and not a maintainer
On 8/20/25 12:20, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> In the MAINTAINERS file, x86@...nel.org is listed as both:
>
> M: x86@...nel.org
>
> and
>
> L: x86@...nel.org
>
> The MAINTAINERS document starts with:
>
> M: *Mail* patches to: FullName <address@...ain>
> [..]
> L: *Mailing list* that is relevant to this area
Yeah, it's not a person, but it's also not a list that folks can
subscribe to. So there really isn't a good fit for it. I've never heard
of it causing any problems, so my inclination would be to just leave it
as-is.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists