| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <aKZAaE0ktR2_Ae9c@krava>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 23:38:48 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 perf/core 10/22] uprobes/x86: Add support to optimize
uprobes
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 02:30:33PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 09:15:15PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 01:21:20PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> > > +void arch_uprobe_optimize(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, unsigned long vaddr)
> > > +{
> > > + struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> > > + uprobe_opcode_t insn[5];
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Do not optimize if shadow stack is enabled, the return address hijack
> > > + * code in arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr updates wrong frame when
> > > + * the entry uprobe is optimized and the shadow stack crashes the app.
> > > + */
> > > + if (shstk_is_enabled())
> > > + return;
> >
> > Kernel should be able to fix up userspace shadow stack just fine.
> >
> > > + if (!should_optimize(auprobe))
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + mmap_write_lock(mm);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Check if some other thread already optimized the uprobe for us,
> > > + * if it's the case just go away silently.
> > > + */
> > > + if (copy_from_vaddr(mm, vaddr, &insn, 5))
> > > + goto unlock;
> > > + if (!is_swbp_insn((uprobe_opcode_t*) &insn))
> > > + goto unlock;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * If we fail to optimize the uprobe we set the fail bit so the
> > > + * above should_optimize will fail from now on.
> > > + */
> > > + if (__arch_uprobe_optimize(auprobe, mm, vaddr))
> > > + set_bit(ARCH_UPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZE_FAIL, &auprobe->flags);
> > > +
> > > +unlock:
> > > + mmap_write_unlock(mm);
> > > +}
>
> Something a little like this should do I suppose...
>
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/shstk.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/shstk.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ int setup_signal_shadow_stack(struct ksi
> int restore_signal_shadow_stack(void);
> int shstk_update_last_frame(unsigned long val);
> bool shstk_is_enabled(void);
> +int shstk_pop(u64 *val);
> +int shstk_push(u64 val);
> #else
> static inline long shstk_prctl(struct task_struct *task, int option,
> unsigned long arg2) { return -EINVAL; }
> @@ -35,6 +37,8 @@ static inline int setup_signal_shadow_st
> static inline int restore_signal_shadow_stack(void) { return 0; }
> static inline int shstk_update_last_frame(unsigned long val) { return 0; }
> static inline bool shstk_is_enabled(void) { return false; }
> +static inline int shstk_pop(u64 *val) { return -ENOTSUPP; }
> +static inline int shstk_push(u64 val) { return -ENOTSUPP; }
> #endif /* CONFIG_X86_USER_SHADOW_STACK */
>
> #endif /* __ASSEMBLER__ */
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
> @@ -246,6 +246,46 @@ static unsigned long get_user_shstk_addr
> return ssp;
> }
>
> +int shstk_pop(u64 *val)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + u64 ssp;
> +
> + if (!features_enabled(ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK))
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> + fpregs_lock_and_load();
> +
> + rdmsrq(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, ssp);
> + if (val && get_user(*val, (__user u64 *)ssp))
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + ssp += SS_FRAME_SIZE;
> + wrmsrq(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, ssp);
> +
> + fpregs_unlock();
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int shstk_push(u64 val)
> +{
> + u64 ssp;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!features_enabled(ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK))
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> + fpregs_lock_and_load();
> +
> + rdmsrq(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, ssp);
> + ssp -= SS_FRAME_SIZE;
> + wrmsrq(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, ssp);
> + ret = write_user_shstk_64((__user void *)ssp, val);
> + fpregs_unlock();
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> #define SHSTK_DATA_BIT BIT(63)
>
> static int put_shstk_data(u64 __user *addr, u64 data)
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> @@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(uprobe)
> {
> struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
> struct uprobe_syscall_args args;
> - unsigned long ip, sp;
> + unsigned long ip, sp, sret;
> int err;
>
> /* Allow execution only from uprobe trampolines. */
> @@ -831,6 +831,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(uprobe)
>
> sp = regs->sp;
>
> + if (shstk_pop(&sret) == 0 && sret != args.retaddr)
> + goto sigill;
> +
> handle_syscall_uprobe(regs, regs->ip);
>
> /*
> @@ -855,6 +858,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(uprobe)
> if (args.retaddr - 5 != regs->ip)
> args.retaddr = regs->ip;
>
> + if (shstk_push(args.retaddr) == -EFAULT)
> + goto sigill;
> +
> regs->ip = ip;
>
> err = copy_to_user((void __user *)regs->sp, &args, sizeof(args));
> @@ -1124,14 +1130,6 @@ void arch_uprobe_optimize(struct arch_up
> struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> uprobe_opcode_t insn[5];
>
> - /*
> - * Do not optimize if shadow stack is enabled, the return address hijack
> - * code in arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr updates wrong frame when
> - * the entry uprobe is optimized and the shadow stack crashes the app.
> - */
> - if (shstk_is_enabled())
> - return;
> -
nice, we will need to adjust selftests for that, there's shadow stack part
in prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c that expects non optimized uprobe after enabling
shadow stack.. I'll run it and send the change
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists