[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250820062520.846720-1-duanchenghao@kylinos.cn>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 14:25:20 +0800
From: Chenghao Duan <duanchenghao@...inos.cn>
To: ast@...nel.org,
bjorn@...nel.org,
pulehui@...wei.com,
puranjay@...nel.org,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu
Cc: daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev,
eddyz87@...il.com,
song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
alex@...ti.fr,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
duanchenghao@...inos.cn
Subject: [PATCH] riscv: bpf: Fix uninitialized symbol 'retval_off'
In __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(), retval_off is only meaningful when
save_ret is true, so the current logic is correct. However, in the
original logic, retval_off is only initialized under certain
conditions, which may cause a build warning.
So initialize retval_off unconditionally to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Chenghao Duan <duanchenghao@...inos.cn>
---
arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 10e01ff06312..49bbda8372b0 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -1079,10 +1079,9 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
stack_size += 16;
save_ret = flags & (BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG | BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET);
- if (save_ret) {
+ if (save_ret)
stack_size += 16; /* Save both A5 (BPF R0) and A0 */
- retval_off = stack_size;
- }
+ retval_off = stack_size;
stack_size += nr_arg_slots * 8;
args_off = stack_size;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists