[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKWdG6ad5e_B_flD@google.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 10:02:03 +0000
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
Cc: a.hindborg@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, ojeda@...nel.org,
anna-maria@...utronix.de, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
dakr@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org, gary@...yguo.net, jstultz@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lossin@...nel.org, lyude@...hat.com,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, sboyd@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
tmgross@...ch.edu, acourbot@...dia.com, daniel.almeida@...labora.com,
Fiona Behrens <me@...enk.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rust: Add read_poll_timeout functions
On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 01:47:23PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> Add read_poll_timeout function which poll periodically until a
> condition is met or a timeout is reached.
>
> The C's read_poll_timeout (include/linux/iopoll.h) is a complicated
> macro and a simple wrapper for Rust doesn't work. So this implements
> the same functionality in Rust.
>
> The C version uses usleep_range() while the Rust version uses
> fsleep(), which uses the best sleep method so it works with spans that
> usleep_range() doesn't work nicely with.
>
> The sleep_before_read argument isn't supported since there is no user
> for now. It's rarely used in the C version.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens <me@...enk.dev>
> Tested-by: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists