[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12ab93b7-1fc2-4ce0-926e-c8141cfe81bf@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 15:09:42 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Sven Peter <sven@...nel.org>, Nick Chan <towinchenmi@...il.com>
Cc: Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>, Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Neal Gompa <neal@...pa.dev>, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] dt-bindings: nvme: apple,nvme-ans: Add Apple A11
On 21/08/2025 12:25, Sven Peter wrote:
>
>
> 1) For situations like this one where the generic one just doesn't make
> any sense we deprecate "apple,nvme-ans2" in the binding and use
> "apple,t8103-nvme-ans2" as the fallback instead, i.e. just
> "apple,t8103-nvme-ans2" for M1, "apple,t6000-nvme-ans2",
> "apple,t8103-nvme-ans2" for M1 Pro, and just "apple,t8015-nvme-ans2" for
> A11.
>
> We keep the generic one in the driver for now but also add
> "apple,t8103-nvme-ans2". We then remove the generic one from all
> upstream DTS files but keep it inside the downstream files we ship to
> users for now to avoid pain with kernel upgrades/downgrades.
> A year or two from now we can then delete the deprecated generic
> compatibles everywhere. This all has to be synced with OpenBSD and
> u-boot as well since both also use these bindings.
> It's gonna be rather painful but this would clean up the entire mess.
>
>
> 2) We keep using the ones that are already upstream and just accept that
> the situation is a mess and add comment above all the bindings that we
> messed up and that this should not be used as pattern.
> In this case that means it'll just be "apple,t8015-nvme-ans2" for A11
> without any fallback and we keep everything else the way it is.
>
> I prefer option (2) but if you really want to get rid of all this mess
I also prefer option (2). That's the least disruptive option for users
and inconsistency in bindings naming is just inconsistency, no big deal.
You just need to remember not to grow the old items/pattern with generic
compatible.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists