linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] docs: media: document media multi-committers rules and process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aKcaQ7R1LTWRf3rd@valkosipuli.retiisi.eu>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 13:08:19 +0000
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
	Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] docs: media: document media multi-committers
 rules and process

Hi Mauro, Hans,

On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 10:35:48AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> As the media subsystem will experiment with a multi-committers model,
> update the Maintainer's entry profile to the new rules, and add a file
> documenting the process to become a committer and to maintain such
> rights.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
> Reviewed-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>

Overall it looks like the review comments are fine tuning with probably
little effect in practice right now. Do you think you could re-spin the
series, taking the discussion into account?

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus