linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Add MAX14001/MAX14002 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aKdyW1rWlwNFg85k@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 16:24:11 -0300
From: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Marilene Andrade Garcia <marilene.agarcia@...il.com>,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
	Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Marcelo Schmitt <Marcelo.Schmitt@...log.com>,
	Ceclan Dumitru <dumitru.ceclan@...log.com>,
	Jonathan Santos <Jonathan.Santos@...log.com>,
	Dragos Bogdan <dragos.bogdan@...log.com>,
	Kim Seer Paller <kimseer.paller@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Add MAX14001/MAX14002 support

On 08/21, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 10:36:06AM -0300, Marilene Andrade Garcia wrote:
> > Hello maintainers,
> > 
> > This patch series adds basic support for the Analog Devices 
> > MAX14001/MAX14002, configurable, isolated 10-bit ADCs for multi-range 
...
> 
> Something gone wrong here? There's already a v9 from another ADI
> employee on the list:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230710042723.46084-2-kimseer.paller@analog.com/

Yes, my procedure for finding parts for GSoC projects failed to find that set.
>From quick read of v9 thread, the reason for that not being applied was lack
of detailed comments about device data transfer handling?
Anyway, I guess the only thing left to do now is see what can be taken from
Marilene's set and applied on top of Kim's one.

I'm sorry for this unfortunate situation.