linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] docs: rcu: Replace multiple dead OLS links in RTFP.txt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <877bywqq4q.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 16:14:13 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: Nikil Paul S <snikilpaul@...il.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 skhan@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] docs: rcu: Replace multiple dead OLS links in RTFP.txt

"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> writes:

> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 11:54:45AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> Nikil Paul S <snikilpaul@...il.com> writes:
>> 
>> > This patch updates several dead OLS links in RTFP.txt, replacing them
>> > with working copies hosted on kernel.org.
>> >
>> > Originally posted as part of a 2-patch series, this is now being sent
>> > as a standalone v4 patch to avoid confusion.
>> >
>> > Changes since v3:
>> >  - No change in content, only resubmitted as a single patch instead of
>> >    "2/2" from the earlier series.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Nikil Paul S <snikilpaul@...il.com>
>> > ---
>> >  Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt | 6 +++---
>> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> So this looks good to me, but it should really be run past the RCU folks
>> (and Paul in particular) as well; adding him to the CC.
>
> I queued this and checked it and it looks good.  By default, I would
> send this during the upcoming merge window.  But if you would rather
> take it:
>
> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
>
> Either way, let me know!

It's all yours.

Thanks,

jon