[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276CCC219B8456DAF289AD78C32A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:07:01 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
CC: "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>, "joro@...tes.org"
<joro@...tes.org>, "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"robin.clark@....qualcomm.com" <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>,
"yong.wu@...iatek.com" <yong.wu@...iatek.com>, "matthias.bgg@...il.com"
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>, "angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, "thierry.reding@...il.com"
<thierry.reding@...il.com>, "vdumpa@...dia.com" <vdumpa@...dia.com>,
"jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>, "rafael@...nel.org"
<rafael@...nel.org>, "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>, "Liu, Yi L"
<yi.l.liu@...el.com>, "baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "iommu@...ts.linux.dev"
<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "patches@...ts.linux.dev"
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>, "Jaroszynski, Piotr" <pjaroszynski@...dia.com>,
"Sethi, Vikram" <vsethi@...dia.com>, "helgaas@...nel.org"
<helgaas@...nel.org>, "etzhao1900@...il.com" <etzhao1900@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add iommu_get_domain_for_dev_locked()
helper
> From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2025 2:45 AM
>
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 08:55:28AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2025 6:59 AM
> > > So, iommu_get_domain_for_dev() should check the gdev flag and return
> the
> > > blocked domain if the flag is set. But the caller of this API could hold
> > > the group->mutex already or not, making it difficult to add the lock.
> > >
> > > Introduce a new iommu_get_domain_for_dev_locked() helper to be used
> by
> > > those drivers in a context that is already under the protection of the
> > > group->mutex, e.g. those attach_dev callback functions. And roll out the
> > > new helper to all the existing IOMMU drivers.
> >
> > iommu_get_domain_for_dev() is also called outside of attach_dev
> > callback functions, e.g. malidp_get_pgsize_bitmap(). and the returned
> > info according to the attached domain might be saved in static
> > structures, e.g.:
> >
> > ms->mmu_prefetch_pgsize = malidp_get_pgsize_bitmap(mp);
> >
> > would that cause weird issues when blocking domain is returned
> > though one may not expect reset to happen at that point?
>
> We aren't changing the iommu_get_domain_for_dev(). So, it should
> be used exclusively for functions that are outside group->mutex,
> like this one, i.e. they should still get the group->domain v.s.
> the blocked domain.
>
Usually the difference between func() and func_locked() is only about
whether the caller holds a lock. If they mean to return different
domains, may need better naming (though I don't have a good option
now)...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists