[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276262E1925E2CD8AE037EF8C32A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:11:05 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>, "joro@...tes.org"
<joro@...tes.org>, "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "robin.clark@....qualcomm.com"
<robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>, "yong.wu@...iatek.com"
<yong.wu@...iatek.com>, "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, "thierry.reding@...il.com"
<thierry.reding@...il.com>, "vdumpa@...dia.com" <vdumpa@...dia.com>,
"jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>, "rafael@...nel.org"
<rafael@...nel.org>, "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>, "Liu, Yi L"
<yi.l.liu@...el.com>, "baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "iommu@...ts.linux.dev"
<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "patches@...ts.linux.dev"
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>, "Jaroszynski, Piotr" <pjaroszynski@...dia.com>,
"Sethi, Vikram" <vsethi@...dia.com>, "helgaas@...nel.org"
<helgaas@...nel.org>, "etzhao1900@...il.com" <etzhao1900@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add iommu_get_domain_for_dev_locked()
helper
> From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2025 1:23 AM
>
> ... I found that in SMMUv3 driver, iommu_get_domain_for_dev() is
> used to get the RID domain for an SVA domain:
> arm_smmu_set_pasid()
> arm_smmu_blocking_set_dev_pasid()
>
> These two are already given an "old" (SVA) domain pointer, FWIW.
>
> So, we may change to passing in the old domain as you suggested,
> yet we still have to fix the iommu_get_domain_for_dev() in order
> to reflect the RID domain correctly for the driver that calls it
> (or even potentially) in some group->mutex locked context where
> the RID domain might not be naturally passed in.
>
Out of curiosity.
arm_smmu_blocking_set_dev_pasid()
/*
* When the last user of the CD table goes away downgrade the STE back
* to a non-cd_table one.
*/
if (!arm_smmu_ssids_in_use(&master->cd_table)) {
struct iommu_domain *sid_domain =
iommu_get_domain_for_dev(master->dev);
if (sid_domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY ||
sid_domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED)
sid_domain->ops->attach_dev(sid_domain, dev);
}
why cannot downgrade apply to the case where the RID is attached to
a DMA domain?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists