lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKbY7YeRuRSpptZD@li-dc0c254c-257c-11b2-a85c-98b6c1322444.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 13:59:33 +0530
From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com>, fstests@...r.kernel.org,
        Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>, djwong@...nel.org,
        tytso@....edu, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] ext4: Atomic writes stress test for bigalloc
 using fio crc verifier

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:33:44AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 13/08/2025 08:08, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> > > > +_begin_fstest auto rw stress atomicwrites
> > > > +
> > > > +_require_scratch_write_atomic
> > > > +_require_aiodio
> > > do you require fio with a certain version somewhere?
> > Oh right you mentioned that atomic=1 was broken on some older fios.
> 
> It was not broken - it just did nothing. I suppose that they are the same
> thing.
> 
> > Would you happen to know which version fixed it?
> 
> fio 3.38

Thanks, I'll add the version check.
> 
> thanks,
> John

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ