[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7bffc8e2-ccdd-4a92-bbc6-95c7c99d7e4a@ideasonboard.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 11:52:38 +0300
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@...asonboard.com>
To: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai.xr@...renesas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/6] drm: renesas: rz-du: mipi_dsi: Add support for
LPCLK clock handling
Hi,
On 28/07/2025 23:14, Prabhakar wrote:
> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>
> Add LPCLK clock support in the RZ/G2L MIPI DSI driver via the optional
> clock API. This clock is required by some SoCs like RZ/V2H(P) for proper
> DPHY configuration, whereas it is absent on others like RZ/G2L.
In the DT binding lpclk is present for all SoCs. Is that an error in the
binding, then? And if I read the binding correctly, it's mandatory for
all SoCs, so why is it optional in the driver?
Tomi
> Introduce a new `lpclk` field in the `rzg2l_mipi_dsi` structure and
> conditionally acquire the "lpclk" clock using `devm_clk_get_optional()`
> during probe. This allows LPCLK-aware SoCs to pass the clock via device
> tree without impacting existing platforms.
>
> Co-developed-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> ---
> v6->v7:
> - New patch
> Note, this patch was previously part of series [0].
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250609225630.502888-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_mipi_dsi.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_mipi_dsi.c
> index f87337c3cbb5..893a90c7a886 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_mipi_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_mipi_dsi.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct rzg2l_mipi_dsi {
> struct drm_bridge *next_bridge;
>
> struct clk *vclk;
> + struct clk *lpclk;
>
> enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format format;
> unsigned int num_data_lanes;
> @@ -979,6 +980,10 @@ static int rzg2l_mipi_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(dsi->vclk))
> return PTR_ERR(dsi->vclk);
>
> + dsi->lpclk = devm_clk_get_optional(dsi->dev, "lpclk");
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->lpclk))
> + return PTR_ERR(dsi->lpclk);
> +
> dsi->rstc = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(dsi->dev, "rst");
> if (IS_ERR(dsi->rstc))
> return dev_err_probe(dsi->dev, PTR_ERR(dsi->rstc),
Powered by blists - more mailing lists