lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b39d392-0a10-47fd-ac3c-b73a1e341e86@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 10:28:56 +0100
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com>, fstests@...r.kernel.org,
        Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>, djwong@...nel.org,
        tytso@....edu, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] ext4: Atomic writes test for bigalloc using fio
 crc verifier on multiple files

On 21/08/2025 09:28, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> Yes these 2 tests are similar however 061 uses fallocate=native +
> _scratch_mkfs_ext4 to test whether atomic writes on preallocated file
> via multiple threads works correctly.
> 
> The 062 uses fallocate=truncate + _scratch_mkfs_sized 360MB +
> 'multiple jobs each writing to a different file' to ensure we are
> extensively stressing the allocation logic in low space scenarios.

I see, please at least fully document this in the commit messages.

Thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ