linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] iio: Drop unnecessary -ENOMEM messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFmh=S3x+SsuW79MdN6gE66CSK7smvbBy=22j=c9jGVOns6PiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 14:58:34 +0530
From: Dixit Parmar <dixitparmar19@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, 
	Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, 
	Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, 
	Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>, 
	Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, 
	Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, 
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>, 
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, 
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, 
	Cai Huoqing <cai.huoqing@...ux.dev>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, 
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>, 
	Crt Mori <cmo@...exis.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
	imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] iio: Drop unnecessary -ENOMEM messages

On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 11:49 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I don't understand. Don't you have a subscription to linux-iio@ ML?
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/CAHp75VdL9kV2fyi63zqPZnW4CaeYPmJ74tmGEgU=M7FSYBv0ww@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
> If you found something new, please base it on that series as it was
> already sent and reviewed.
Thanks. I do have subscription to linux-iio@ML and did check the patch
series you mentioned.
That patch series by Xichao Zhao removes dev_err_probe() for -ENOMEM
cases whereas
this series is targeting slightly different cleanup of removing the
plain dev_err() log messages
that are there for -ENOMEM.
As far as I can see, both the series are modifying completely
different driver files without overlapping changes.
Since the objectives are related but independent and addressing
different type of change, I thought to keep
these patches in different patch series and have clear differentiation.
Although to establish similarity it would have made more sense If I
would have added the link to that patch series here.
Thanks,
Dixit