linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] iio: Drop unnecessary -ENOMEM messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aKg6WP361s6gcUTD@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 12:37:28 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Dixit Parmar <dixitparmar19@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
	Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
	Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
	Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	Cai Huoqing <cai.huoqing@...ux.dev>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>, Crt Mori <cmo@...exis.com>,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] iio: Drop unnecessary -ENOMEM messages

On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 02:58:34PM +0530, Dixit Parmar wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 11:49 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > I don't understand. Don't you have a subscription to linux-iio@ ML?
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/CAHp75VdL9kV2fyi63zqPZnW4CaeYPmJ74tmGEgU=M7FSYBv0ww@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
> > If you found something new, please base it on that series as it was
> > already sent and reviewed.

> Thanks. I do have subscription to linux-iio@ML and did check the patch
> series you mentioned.
> That patch series by Xichao Zhao removes dev_err_probe() for -ENOMEM
> cases whereas
> this series is targeting slightly different cleanup of removing the
> plain dev_err() log messages
> that are there for -ENOMEM.

I see, makes sense.

> As far as I can see, both the series are modifying completely
> different driver files without overlapping changes.
> Since the objectives are related but independent and addressing
> different type of change, I thought to keep
> these patches in different patch series and have clear differentiation.
> Although to establish similarity it would have made more sense If I
> would have added the link to that patch series here.

With this clarification it indeed may be applied independently.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko