lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <538ed0a4-fbf9-47c3-bbc2-3263d869e21c@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2025 17:46:22 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
 Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
 Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
 Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
 Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
 Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] media: iris: Enable Secure PAS support with
 IOMMU managed by Linux

On 23/08/2025 17:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/08/2025 17:13, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 10:45:50AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 19/08/2025 18:54, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>>>> +int iris_fw_init(struct iris_core *core)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct platform_device_info info;
>>>> +	struct iommu_domain *iommu_dom;
>>>> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
>>>> +	struct device_node *np;
>>>> +	int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +	np = of_get_child_by_name(core->dev->of_node, "video-firmware");
>>>
>>> Undocumented ABI.
>>>
>>> If you tested your DTS, you would notice warnings.
>>
>> qcom,venus-common.yaml is documenting video-firmware and getting included in
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8550-iris.yaml
> 
> Uh, why? Why does qcom keep this legacy pattern also for iris?

I will remove it btw, because it is a fake device node (not for a real
device).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ