[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95e31ebe-08d8-4b04-a624-f0ecb8a57d3f@web.de>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 16:12:29 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@...il.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Harshal Gohel <hg@...onwunderlich.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@....de>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/12] i2c: rtl9300: use scoped guard instead of
explicit lock/unlock
…
> when the guard goes out of scope, instead of explicity lock/unlock. This
…
explicit? Would such a word be nicer in the next line?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists