lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <453e4d9a-b798-401b-9bdd-23786f693baf@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 11:20:24 -0400
From: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
        tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] DRM IDR to Xarray conversions

On 8/25/25 2:52 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2025, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 10:36:24AM -0400, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
>>> On 8/22/25 8:33 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>>> It would be great if the commit messages mentioned whether the
>>>> identifiers are expected to remain the same in the conversion.
>>>
>>> By identifiers do you mean if the name of the previous idr variable is the
>>> same as the XArray variable that is introduced? Sure I can add that in a v3.
>>
>> I think Jani means that the actual numbers assigned should remain the
>> saame after the conversion.
> 
> Yes. Do they?

Yes, they'll remain the same after the patches. I'll add this to the 
commit messages in v3.

Thanks,
Sid


> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ