lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <586cd833db27544321eb9521720803e148519557@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 09:52:48 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Sidhartha Kumar
 <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
 tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] DRM IDR to Xarray conversions

On Fri, 22 Aug 2025, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 10:36:24AM -0400, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
>> On 8/22/25 8:33 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> > It would be great if the commit messages mentioned whether the
>> > identifiers are expected to remain the same in the conversion.
>> 
>> By identifiers do you mean if the name of the previous idr variable is the
>> same as the XArray variable that is introduced? Sure I can add that in a v3.
>
> I think Jani means that the actual numbers assigned should remain the
> saame after the conversion.

Yes. Do they?

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ