[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11546959-3090-4070-93fa-349bc64f3bdd@broadcom.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 20:50:31 +0200
From: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
To: tanzheng <tanzheng@...inos.cn>, johannes@...solutions.net
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] wifi: cfg80211: simplify the code
On 8/25/2025 7:51 AM, tanzheng wrote:
> Simplifying the code makes it more readableļ¼
> 1.Use dev_name instead of pdev->driver->name.
> 2.There is no need to call wiphy_dev again.
Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng tan <tanzheng@...inos.cn>
> ---
> net/wireless/ethtool.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/wireless/ethtool.c b/net/wireless/ethtool.c
> index 2613d6ac0fda..0acfdc44b479 100644
> --- a/net/wireless/ethtool.c
> +++ b/net/wireless/ethtool.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ void cfg80211_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_drvinfo *info)
> struct device *pdev = wiphy_dev(wdev->wiphy);
>
> if (pdev->driver)
> - strscpy(info->driver, pdev->driver->name,
> + strscpy(info->driver, dev_name(pdev),
Did you test this with some wifi device before and after applying the
patch. This is not correct as pdev->driver->name is the name of the
*driver* and dev_name(pdev) is the name of the *device*. Those are two
different things.
> sizeof(info->driver));
> else
> strscpy(info->driver, "N/A", sizeof(info->driver));
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ void cfg80211_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_drvinfo *info)
> else
> strscpy(info->fw_version, "N/A", sizeof(info->fw_version));
>
> - strscpy(info->bus_info, dev_name(wiphy_dev(wdev->wiphy)),
> + strscpy(info->bus_info, dev_name(pdev),
This makes sense.
> sizeof(info->bus_info));
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(cfg80211_get_drvinfo);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists