lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <139bf7d77750fdf04d26e1a77c0955466c9a4827.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 12:32:29 -0700
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
To: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>
Cc: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@...ux.dev>, puranjay@...nel.org, 
	xukuohai@...weicloud.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, 
	john.fastabend@...il.com, andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
 song@...nel.org, 	yonghong.song@...ux.dev, kpsingh@...nel.org,
 sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, 	jolsa@...nel.org, mykolal@...com,
 shuah@...nel.org, mrpre@....com, 	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, 	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add socket filter attach test

On Mon, 2025-08-25 at 21:27 +0200, Puranjay Mohan wrote:

[...]

> Hi Eduard,
> 
> You were right, I have verified that the program is hitting the 0xfff
> boundary while doing the call to bpf_skb_load_helper_32
> While jiting this call, emit_a32_mov_i(tmp[1], func, ctx); is called,
> where this issue it triggered.
> 
> The offset in imm_offset() is calculated as:
> ctx->offsets[ctx->prog->len - 1] * 4 + ctx->prologue_bytes +
> ctx->epilogue_bytes + imm_i * 4
> 
> For this program, ctx->offsets[ctx->prog->len - 1] * 4 itself is
> 0x1400 which is above 0xfff boundary.
> So, this is not a bug and expected behaviour with the current
> implementation of the JIT.
> 
> For now, we can merge this and later I will try to improve the JIT so
> it works for bigger programs.

Hi Puranjay,

Thank you for checking this!
What do you think about this test case, do we need it in the suite?

Best regards,
Eduard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ