[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0395d500-0b8e-4a2b-9dcd-d33df994f581@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 01:22:14 +0530
From: ALOK TIWARI <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>
To: Fan Gong <gongfan1@...wei.com>, Zhu Yikai <zhuyikai1@...artners.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
luosifu <luosifu@...wei.com>, Xin Guo <guoxin09@...wei.com>,
Shen Chenyang <shenchenyang1@...ilicon.com>,
Zhou Shuai <zhoushuai28@...wei.com>, Wu Like <wulike1@...wei.com>,
Shi Jing <shijing34@...wei.com>,
Meny Yossefi <meny.yossefi@...wei.com>,
Gur Stavi <gur.stavi@...wei.com>, Lee Trager <lee@...ger.us>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
Suman Ghosh
<sumang@...vell.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v01 01/12] hinic3: HW initialization
> +static int db_area_idx_init(struct hinic3_hwif *hwif, u64 db_base_phy,
> + u8 __iomem *db_base, u64 db_dwqe_len)
> +{
> + struct hinic3_db_area *db_area = &hwif->db_area;
> + u32 db_max_areas;
> +
> + hwif->db_base_phy = db_base_phy;
> + hwif->db_base = db_base;
> + hwif->db_dwqe_len = db_dwqe_len;
> +
> + db_max_areas = db_dwqe_len > HINIC3_DB_DWQE_SIZE ?
> + HINIC3_DB_MAX_AREAS : db_dwqe_len / HINIC3_DB_PAGE_SIZE;
> + db_area->db_bitmap_array = bitmap_zalloc(db_max_areas, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!db_area->db_bitmap_array)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + db_area->db_max_areas = db_max_areas;
> + spin_lock_init(&db_area->idx_lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void db_area_idx_free(struct hinic3_db_area *db_area)
> +{
> + kfree(db_area->db_bitmap_array);
db_bitmap_array allocation was done via bitmap_zalloc().
is it ok to use kfree? or bitmap_free
> +}
> +
> static int get_db_idx(struct hinic3_hwif *hwif, u32 *idx)
> {
> struct hinic3_db_area *db_area = &hwif->db_area;
> @@ -125,6 +273,15 @@ void hinic3_set_msix_state(struct hinic3_hwdev *hwdev, u16 msix_idx,
> hinic3_hwif_write_reg(hwif, addr, mask_bits);
> }
>
[clip]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic3/hinic3_pci_id_tbl.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic3/hinic3_pci_id_tbl.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7d60bd45ad1b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic3/hinic3_pci_id_tbl.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/* Copyright (c) Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 2025. All rights reserved. */
> +
> +#ifndef _HINIC3_PCI_ID_TBL_H_
> +#define _HINIC3_PCI_ID_TBL_H_
> +
> +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI 0x19e5
kernel already has PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI in <linux/pci_ids.h>
> +#define PCI_DEV_ID_HINIC3_VF 0x375F
> +
> +#endif
Thanks,
Alok
Powered by blists - more mailing lists