[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d15313f4-46d1-4096-bdf1-783afd8e439d@amperemail.onmicrosoft.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 16:51:05 -0400
From: Adam Young <admiyo@...eremail.onmicrosoft.com>
To: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>, admiyo@...amperecomputing.com,
Matt Johnston <matt@...econstruct.com.au>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v25 1/1] mctp pcc: Implement MCTP over PCC
Transport
In addition to the below comment, I am removing the additional lock on
the skb lists and using the internal one for all operations. It leads
to leaner and cleaner code.
Updated driver shortly.
On 8/22/25 04:21, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
>> + mctp_pcc_ndev->inbox.chan->rx_alloc = mctp_pcc_rx_alloc;
>> + mctp_pcc_ndev->outbox.chan->manage_writes = true;
>> +
>> + /* There is no clean way to pass the MTU to the callback function
>> + * used for registration, so set the values ahead of time.
>> + */
> For my own clarity, what's "the callback function used for
> registration"?
Actually, this is not longer true: we can do it in ndo_open, and it is
clean. Removed the comment.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists