[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250826082057.GE3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 10:20:57 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] objtool/LoongArch: Fix unreachable instruction
warnings about head.S
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 02:46:31PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> When compiling with LLVM and CONFIG_LTO_CLANG is set, there exist the
> following objtool warnings after silencing all of the other warnings:
>
> LD vmlinux.o
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x0: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x18: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x38: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x3c: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x40: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x44: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x54: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x58: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x6c: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x84: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x94: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x9c: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0xc4: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0xf8: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0xfc: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x104: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x10c: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x11c: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x120: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x124: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0x144: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: kernel_entry+0x0: unreachable instruction
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: smpboot_entry+0x0: unreachable instruction
>
> All of the above instructions are in arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S,
> and there is "OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD_head.o := y" in Makefile
> to skip objtool checking for head.o, but OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD
> does not work for link time validation of vmlinux.o according to
> tools/objtool/Documentation/objtool.txt.
>
> Just give a proper unwind hint to silence the above warnings. By the way,
> the previous instructions of kernel_entry+0xf4 and smpboot_entry+0x68 are
> the 'bl' instructions, the call destination symbols are start_kernel() and
> start_secondary() which are noreturn functions, then the 'bl' instructions
> are marked as dead end in annotate_call_site(), so actually ASM_BUG() can
> be removed due to unnecessary, otherwise there are following warnings:
>
> kernel_entry+0xf4: start_kernel() missing __noreturn
> in .c/.h or NORETURN() in noreturns.h
>
> smpboot_entry+0x68: start_secondary() missing __noreturn
> in .c/.h or NORETURN() in noreturns.h
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250814083651.GR4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
> ---
> arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
At this point you should also be able to remove that Makefile thing,
right?
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S b/arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S
> index e3865e92a917..566a1dbf5fa0 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/head.S
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> __HEAD
>
> _head:
> + UNWIND_HINT_UNDEFINED
> .word IMAGE_DOS_SIGNATURE /* "MZ", MS-DOS header */
> .org 0x8
> .dword _kernel_entry /* Kernel entry point (physical address) */
> @@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ _head:
> .long pe_header - _head /* Offset to the PE header */
>
> pe_header:
> + UNWIND_HINT_UNDEFINED
> __EFI_PE_HEADER
>
> SYM_DATA(kernel_asize, .long _kernel_asize);
> @@ -42,6 +44,7 @@ SYM_DATA(kernel_fsize, .long _kernel_fsize);
> .align 12
>
> SYM_CODE_START(kernel_entry) # kernel entry point
> + UNWIND_HINT_UNDEFINED
>
> /* Config direct window and set PG */
> SETUP_DMWINS t0
> @@ -109,8 +112,6 @@ SYM_CODE_START(kernel_entry) # kernel entry point
> #endif
>
> bl start_kernel
> - ASM_BUG()
> -
> SYM_CODE_END(kernel_entry)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> @@ -120,6 +121,7 @@ SYM_CODE_END(kernel_entry)
> * function after setting up the stack and tp registers.
> */
> SYM_CODE_START(smpboot_entry)
> + UNWIND_HINT_UNDEFINED
>
> SETUP_DMWINS t0
> JUMP_VIRT_ADDR t0, t1
> @@ -142,8 +144,6 @@ SYM_CODE_START(smpboot_entry)
> ld.d tp, t0, CPU_BOOT_TINFO
>
> bl start_secondary
> - ASM_BUG()
> -
> SYM_CODE_END(smpboot_entry)
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> --
> 2.42.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists