[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aK1ubIiYCOwIFM5r@pixelbook>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 11:21:00 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Bence Csókás <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] dma: Add devm_dma_request_chan()
Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 10:22:53AM +0200, Bence Csókás kirjoitti:
> Expand the arsenal of devm functions for DMA devices, this time for
> requesting channels.
...
> +/**
> + * devm_dma_request_chan - try to allocate an exclusive slave channel
> + * @dev: pointer to client device structure
> + * @name: slave channel name
> + *
> + * Returns pointer to appropriate DMA channel on success or an error pointer.
> + *
> + * The operation is managed and will be undone on driver detach.
This introduced a kernel-doc validation issue (Missing Return section).
> + */
> +
Unneeded blank line.
> +struct dma_chan *devm_dma_request_chan(struct device *dev, const char *name)
> + struct dma_chan *chan = dma_request_chan(dev, name);
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(chan))
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, dmaenginem_release_channel, chan);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> + return chan;
Hmm... We usually use "error check" pattern
Compare to
struct dma_chan *chan;
int ret;
chan = dma_request_chan(dev, name);
if (IS_ERR(chan))
return chan;
ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, dmaenginem_release_channel, chan);
if (ret)
return ERR_PTR(ret);
return chan;
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists