[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aK8_uOoLxLOniEbR@google.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 10:26:16 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vhost tree
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 06:23:52AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:46:54PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The following commit is also in the perf-current tree as a different
> > commit (but the same patch):
> >
> > c67e16d30dca ("tools headers: Sync uapi/linux/vhost.h with the kernel source"
> > )
> >
> > This is commit
> >
> > f79a62f4b3c7 ("tools headers: Sync uapi/linux/vhost.h with the kernel source")
> >
> > in the perf-current tree.
>
>
> Hmm. I could drop mine I guess, but it only really makes sense after:
>
> vhost: Fix ioctl # for VHOST_[GS]ET_FORK_FROM_OWNER
>
>
> which is not in the perf tree.
Yep, so I was waiting for you to send PR with the fix.
It seems you already removed the commit in your tree.
I'll send a PR for perf tools with this change.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists