linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vhost tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250827062218-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 06:23:52 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vhost tree

On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:46:54PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commit is also in the perf-current tree as a different
> commit (but the same patch):
> 
>   c67e16d30dca ("tools headers: Sync uapi/linux/vhost.h with the kernel source"
> )
> 
> This is commit
> 
>   f79a62f4b3c7 ("tools headers: Sync uapi/linux/vhost.h with the kernel source")
> 
> in the perf-current tree.


Hmm.  I could drop mine I guess, but it only really makes sense after:

    vhost: Fix ioctl # for VHOST_[GS]ET_FORK_FROM_OWNER
    

which is not in the perf tree.


> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell