[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f21e27da-de26-4835-9660-b39e99695281@csgroup.eu>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 16:12:41 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>, Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dt-bindings: soc: fsl: qe: Add support of IRQ in
QE GPIO
Le 28/08/2025 à 15:28, Rob Herring a écrit :
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 2:20 AM Christophe Leroy
> <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> wrote:
>>
>> In the QE, a few GPIOs are IRQ capable. Similarly to
>> commit 726bd223105c ("powerpc/8xx: Adding support of IRQ in MPC8xx
>> GPIO"), add IRQ support to QE GPIO.
>>
>> Add property 'fsl,qe-gpio-irq-mask' similar to
>> 'fsl,cpm1-gpio-irq-mask' that define which of the GPIOs have IRQs.
>
> Why do you need to know this? The ones that have interrupts will be
> referenced by an 'interrupts' property somewhere.
I don't follow you. The ones that have interrupts need to be reported by
gc->qe_gpio_to_irq[] so that gpiod_to_irq() return the IRQ number, for
instance to gpio_sysfs_request_irq() so that it can install an irq
handler. I can't see where they would be referenced by an "interrupts"
property.
>
>> Here is an exemple for port B of mpc8323 which has IRQs for
>
> typo
>
>> GPIOs PB7, PB9, PB25 and PB27.
>>
>> qe_pio_b: gpio-controller@...8 {
>> compatible = "fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank";
>> reg = <0x1418 0x18>;
>> interrupts = <4 5 6 7>;
>> interrupt-parent = <&qepic>;
>> gpio-controller;
>> #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> fsl,qe-gpio-irq-mask = <0x01400050>;
>> };
>
> You are missing #interrupt-cells and interrupt-controller properties.
The gpio controller is not an interrupt controller. The GPIO controller
is brought by patch 1/6 and documented in patch 6/6.
>
> With multiple new properties, this should be converted to schema first.
Ah. I didn't know, and checkpatch.pl doesn't know either it seems.
Christophe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists