[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <567d67970b610fe1e9d09dbfaa935e05093495e0.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 19:01:49 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>, "seanjc@...gle.com"
<seanjc@...gle.com>
CC: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "Annapurve, Vishal"
<vannapurve@...gle.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
"michael.roth@....com" <michael.roth@....com>, "Weiny, Ira"
<ira.weiny@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] KVM: x86/mmu: TDX post-populate cleanups
On Tue, 2025-08-26 at 17:05 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> RFC as this is compile tested only (mostly due to lack of access to a TDX
> capable system, but also due to lack of cycles).
Let us know how we could best help with this. The series fails the tests because
of the page size issue Yan pointed. We could just review and test a v2, or if
you want us to pull together the feedback, test the result, and repost please
let us know. I think either should work from our end.
I suspect Vishal could hook you up with a TDX machine. But if you need any setup
help there too, please shout.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists