[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250828192551.13216-1-vnranganath.20@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:55:51 +0530
From: Ranganath V N <vnranganath.20@...il.com>
To: vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev
Cc: andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
vnranganath.20@...il.com,
aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: igb: expose rx_dropped via ethtool -S
>> On 28/08/2025 12:42, Ranganath V N wrote:
>> Currently the igb driver does not reports RX dropped
>> packets in the ethtool -S statistics output, even though
>> this information is already available in struct
>> rtnl_link_stats64.
>>
>> This patch adds rx_dropped, so users can monitor dropped
>> packet counts directly with ethtool.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ranganath V N <vnranganath.20@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c
>> index 92ef33459aec..3c6289e80ba0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c
>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static const struct igb_stats igb_gstrings_stats[] = {
>> }
>> static const struct igb_stats igb_gstrings_net_stats[] = {
>> IGB_NETDEV_STAT(rx_errors),
>> + IGB_NETDEV_STAT(rx_dropped),
>> IGB_NETDEV_STAT(tx_errors),
>> IGB_NETDEV_STAT(tx_dropped),
>> IGB_NETDEV_STAT(rx_length_errors),
> This stat is never used in the igb driver, what's the benefit of
> constant 0 value in the output?
Hi,
I initially proposed exposing it, but after reviewing
the driver, I realized that stats.rx_dropped is never
updated in igb. Exposing it would always show 0.
Ixgbe behaves the same: the counter is present
but never incremented.But this patch wouldn't provide meaningful data.
Thanks again for your guidance.
Ranganath
Powered by blists - more mailing lists