[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250829141233.58081-1-aqibaf@amazon.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 14:12:32 +0000
From: Aqib Faruqui <aqibaf@...zon.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <nh-open-source@...zon.com>, <aqibaf@...zon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: selftests: Fix force_emulation_prefix parameter type mismatch
Fix kvm_is_forced_enabled() to use get_kvm_param_bool() instead of
get_kvm_param_integer() when reading the "force_emulation_prefix" kernel
module parameter.
The force_emulation_prefix parameter is a boolean that accepts Y/N
values, but the function was incorrectly trying to parse it as an
integer using strtol().
Signed-off-by: Aqib Faruqui <aqibaf@...zon.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
index 3f93d1b4f..8edf48b5a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
@@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_is_pmu_enabled(void)
static inline bool kvm_is_forced_emulation_enabled(void)
{
- return !!get_kvm_param_integer("force_emulation_prefix");
+ return get_kvm_param_bool("force_emulation_prefix");
}
static inline bool kvm_is_unrestricted_guest_enabled(void)
--
2.47.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists