lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a3d26a1d-6887-47a4-8679-4567e417f65e@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 17:39:18 +0100
From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
 D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
 carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
 bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
 baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
 Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@...gle.com,
 dfustini@...libre.com, amitsinght@...vell.com,
 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>,
 Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>, Koba Ko <kobak@...dia.com>,
 Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>, fenghuay@...dia.com,
 baisheng.gao@...soc.com, Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@....com>,
 Rafael Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
 Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Hanjun Guo
 <guohanjun@...wei.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/33] arm_mpam: Use long MBWU counters if supported

Hi James,

On 8/22/25 16:30, James Morse wrote:
> From: Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@....com>
> 
> If the 44 bit (long) or 63 bit (LWD) counters are detected on probing
> the RIS, use long/LWD counter instead of the regular 31 bit mbwu
> counter.
> 
> Only 32bit accesses to the MSC are required to be supported by the
> spec, but these registers are 64bits. The lower half may overflow
> into the higher half between two 32bit reads. To avoid this, use
> a helper that reads the top half multiple times to check for overflow.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@....com>
> [morse: merged multiple patches from Rohit]
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> ---
> Changes since RFC:
>  * Commit message wrangling.
>  * Refer to 31 bit counters as opposed to 32 bit (registers).
> ---
>  drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>

> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> index 2ab7f127baaa..8fbcf6eb946a 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> @@ -1002,6 +1002,48 @@ struct mon_read {
>  	int				err;
>  };
>  
> +static bool mpam_ris_has_mbwu_long_counter(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
> +{
> +	return (mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_63counter, &ris->props) ||
> +		mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_44counter, &ris->props));
> +}
> +
> +static u64 mpam_msc_read_mbwu_l(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> +{
> +	int retry = 3;
> +	u32 mbwu_l_low;
> +	u64 mbwu_l_high1, mbwu_l_high2;
> +
> +	mpam_mon_sel_lock_held(msc);
> +
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE((MSMON_MBWU_L + sizeof(u64)) > msc->mapped_hwpage_sz);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &msc->accessibility));
> +
> +	mbwu_l_high2 = __mpam_read_reg(msc, MSMON_MBWU_L + 4);
> +	do {
> +		mbwu_l_high1 = mbwu_l_high2;
> +		mbwu_l_low = __mpam_read_reg(msc, MSMON_MBWU_L);
> +		mbwu_l_high2 = __mpam_read_reg(msc, MSMON_MBWU_L + 4);
> +
> +		retry--;
> +	} while (mbwu_l_high1 != mbwu_l_high2 && retry > 0);
> +
> +	if (mbwu_l_high1 == mbwu_l_high2)
> +		return (mbwu_l_high1 << 32) | mbwu_l_low;
> +	return MSMON___NRDY_L;
> +}
> +
> +static void mpam_msc_zero_mbwu_l(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> +{
> +	mpam_mon_sel_lock_held(msc);
> +
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE((MSMON_MBWU_L + sizeof(u64)) > msc->mapped_hwpage_sz);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &msc->accessibility));
> +
> +	__mpam_write_reg(msc, MSMON_MBWU_L, 0);
> +	__mpam_write_reg(msc, MSMON_MBWU_L + 4, 0);
> +}
> +
>  static void gen_msmon_ctl_flt_vals(struct mon_read *m, u32 *ctl_val,
>  				   u32 *flt_val)
>  {
> @@ -1058,6 +1100,7 @@ static void read_msmon_ctl_flt_vals(struct mon_read *m, u32 *ctl_val,
>  static void clean_msmon_ctl_val(u32 *cur_ctl)
>  {
>  	*cur_ctl &= ~MSMON_CFG_x_CTL_OFLOW_STATUS;
> +	*cur_ctl &= ~MSMON_CFG_MBWU_CTL_OFLOW_STATUS_L;
I observe that this bit is res0, in the CSU case, and so the clearing is ok.
>  }
>  
>  static void write_msmon_ctl_flt_vals(struct mon_read *m, u32 ctl_val,
> @@ -1080,7 +1123,11 @@ static void write_msmon_ctl_flt_vals(struct mon_read *m, u32 ctl_val,
>  	case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu:
>  		mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_FLT, flt_val);
>  		mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_CTL, ctl_val);
> -		mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, MBWU, 0);
> +		if (mpam_ris_has_mbwu_long_counter(m->ris))
> +			mpam_msc_zero_mbwu_l(m->ris->vmsc->msc);
> +		else
> +			mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, MBWU, 0);
> +
>  		mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_CTL, ctl_val | MSMON_CFG_x_CTL_EN);
>  
>  		mbwu_state = &m->ris->mbwu_state[m->ctx->mon];
> @@ -1095,8 +1142,13 @@ static void write_msmon_ctl_flt_vals(struct mon_read *m, u32 ctl_val,
>  
>  static u64 mpam_msmon_overflow_val(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
>  {
> -	/* TODO: scaling, and long counters */
> -	return GENMASK_ULL(30, 0);
> +	/* TODO: implement scaling counters */
> +	if (mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_63counter, &ris->props))
> +		return GENMASK_ULL(62, 0);
> +	else if (mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_44counter, &ris->props))
> +		return GENMASK_ULL(43, 0);
> +	else
> +		return GENMASK_ULL(30, 0);
>  }
>  
>  /* Call with MSC lock held */
> @@ -1138,10 +1190,24 @@ static void __ris_msmon_read(void *arg)
>  		now = FIELD_GET(MSMON___VALUE, now);
>  		break;
>  	case mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu:
> -		now = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, MBWU);
> -		if (mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_hw_nrdy, rprops))
> -			nrdy = now & MSMON___NRDY;
> -		now = FIELD_GET(MSMON___VALUE, now);
> +		/*
> +		 * If long or lwd counters are supported, use them, else revert
> +		 * to the 31 bit counter.
> +		 */
> +		if (mpam_ris_has_mbwu_long_counter(ris)) {
> +			now = mpam_msc_read_mbwu_l(msc);
> +			if (mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_hw_nrdy, rprops))
> +				nrdy = now & MSMON___NRDY_L;
> +			if (mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_63counter, rprops))
> +				now = FIELD_GET(MSMON___LWD_VALUE, now);
> +			else
> +				now = FIELD_GET(MSMON___L_VALUE, now);
> +		} else {
> +			now = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, MBWU);
> +			if (mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_hw_nrdy, rprops))
> +				nrdy = now & MSMON___NRDY;
> +			now = FIELD_GET(MSMON___VALUE, now);
> +		}
>  
>  		if (nrdy)
>  			break;
> @@ -1433,8 +1499,13 @@ static int mpam_save_mbwu_state(void *arg)
>  		cur_ctl = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_CTL);
>  		mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_CTL, 0);
>  
> -		val = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, MBWU);
> -		mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, MBWU, 0);
> +		if (mpam_ris_has_mbwu_long_counter(ris)) {
> +			val = mpam_msc_read_mbwu_l(msc);
> +			mpam_msc_zero_mbwu_l(msc);
> +		} else {
> +			val = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, MBWU);
> +			mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, MBWU, 0);
> +		}
>  
>  		cfg->mon = i;
>  		cfg->pmg = FIELD_GET(MSMON_CFG_MBWU_FLT_PMG, cur_flt);

-- 
Thanks,

Ben


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ