| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ee847bec-ad08-473e-96b5-407872c2a0f2@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 17:56:49 +0100
From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@...gle.com,
dfustini@...libre.com, amitsinght@...vell.com,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>,
Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>, Koba Ko <kobak@...dia.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>, fenghuay@...dia.com,
baisheng.gao@...soc.com, Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@....com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Hanjun Guo
<guohanjun@...wei.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 32/33] arm_mpam: Add kunit test for bitmap reset
Hi James,
On 8/22/25 16:30, James Morse wrote:
> The bitmap reset code has been a source of bugs. Add a unit test.
>
> This currently has to be built in, as the rest of the driver is
> builtin.
>
> Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> ---
> drivers/resctrl/Kconfig | 13 ++++++
> drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 4 ++
> drivers/resctrl/test_mpam_devices.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/resctrl/test_mpam_devices.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/resctrl/Kconfig
> index dff7b87280ab..f5e0609975e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/Kconfig
> @@ -4,8 +4,21 @@ config ARM64_MPAM_DRIVER
> bool "MPAM driver for System IP, e,g. caches and memory controllers"
> depends on ARM64_MPAM && EXPERT
>
> +menu "ARM64 MPAM driver options"
> +
> config ARM64_MPAM_DRIVER_DEBUG
> bool "Enable debug messages from the MPAM driver."
> depends on ARM64_MPAM_DRIVER
> help
> Say yes here to enable debug messages from the MPAM driver.
> +
> +config MPAM_KUNIT_TEST
> + bool "KUnit tests for MPAM driver " if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + depends on KUNIT=y
It depends on ARM64_MPAM_DRIVER as well.
> + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + help
> + Enable this option to run tests in the MPAM driver.
> +
> + If unsure, say N.
> +
> +endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> index 65c30ebfe001..4cf5aae88c53 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> @@ -2903,3 +2903,7 @@ static int __init mpam_msc_driver_init(void)
> }
> /* Must occur after arm64_mpam_register_cpus() from arch_initcall() */
> subsys_initcall(mpam_msc_driver_init);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MPAM_KUNIT_TEST
> +#include "test_mpam_devices.c"
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/test_mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/test_mpam_devices.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8e9d6c88171c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/test_mpam_devices.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +// Copyright (C) 2024 Arm Ltd.
> +/* This file is intended to be included into mpam_devices.c */
> +
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +
> +static void test_mpam_reset_msc_bitmap(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + char *buf = kunit_kzalloc(test, SZ_16K, GFP_KERNEL);
> + struct mpam_msc fake_msc;
> + u32 *test_result;
> +
> + if (!buf)
> + return;
> +
> + fake_msc.mapped_hwpage = buf;
> + fake_msc.mapped_hwpage_sz = SZ_16K;
> + cpumask_copy(&fake_msc.accessibility, cpu_possible_mask);
> +
> + mutex_init(&fake_msc.part_sel_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&fake_msc.part_sel_lock);
> +
> + test_result = (u32 *)(buf + MPAMCFG_CPBM);
> +
> + mpam_reset_msc_bitmap(&fake_msc, MPAMCFG_CPBM, 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_result[0], 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_result[1], 0);
> + test_result[0] = 0;
> + test_result[1] = 0;
> +
> + mpam_reset_msc_bitmap(&fake_msc, MPAMCFG_CPBM, 1);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_result[0], 1);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_result[1], 0);
> + test_result[0] = 0;
> + test_result[1] = 0;
> +
> + mpam_reset_msc_bitmap(&fake_msc, MPAMCFG_CPBM, 16);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_result[0], 0xffff);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_result[1], 0);
> + test_result[0] = 0;
> + test_result[1] = 0;
> +
> + mpam_reset_msc_bitmap(&fake_msc, MPAMCFG_CPBM, 32);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_result[0], 0xffffffff);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_result[1], 0);
> + test_result[0] = 0;
> + test_result[1] = 0;
> +
> + mpam_reset_msc_bitmap(&fake_msc, MPAMCFG_CPBM, 33);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_result[0], 0xffffffff);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_result[1], 1);
> + test_result[0] = 0;
> + test_result[1] = 0;
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&fake_msc.part_sel_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case mpam_devices_test_cases[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_mpam_reset_msc_bitmap),
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite mpam_devices_test_suite = {
> + .name = "mpam_devices_test_suite",
> + .test_cases = mpam_devices_test_cases,
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suites(&mpam_devices_test_suite);
Thanks,
Ben
Powered by blists - more mailing lists