[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKxU2N9o_jJd7mfVQE2yab5xX+-gKa8qB8hLkKJPqZq+YmzE4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 23:12:51 -0700
From: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: wireless: ath9k: add led bindings
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 11:02 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 29/08/2025 03:47, Rosen Penev wrote:
> >> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.example.dts:92.15-25: Warning (reg_format): /example-2/ahb/wifi@...c0000/led:reg: property has invalid length (4 bytes) (#address-cells == 2, #size-cells == 1)
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.example.dts:91.17-94.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-2/ahb/wifi@...c0000/led: node has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.example.dtb: Warning (pci_device_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.example.dtb: Warning (pci_device_bus_num): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.example.dtb: Warning (simple_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.example.dtb: Warning (i2c_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.example.dtb: Warning (spi_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.example.dts:91.17-94.15: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /example-2/ahb/wifi@...c0000/led: Relying on default #address-cells value
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.example.dts:91.17-94.15: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /example-2/ahb/wifi@...c0000/led: Relying on default #size-cells value
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.example.dtb: Warning (unique_unit_address_if_enabled): Failed prerequisite 'avoid_default_addr_size'
> >>
> >> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> >>
> >> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20250827005658.3464-2-rosenp@gmail.com
> > FFS. These reviews were garbage. The next series will effectively be
>
> What? My and Conor reviews were garbage?
I was specifically referring to replacing led-sources with reg. The
latter needs address and size-cells specified which is verbose for no
good reason.
Meaning the initial patchset was almost ideal. Just
of_device_is_available needed to be fixed.
I'm irritated as this will be up to v5 when it should have been up to v2.
>
> It is your patches which never got tested, code was completely messed up
> (see v2 mixing two different things).
>
> I am not going to review your patches.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists