[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFmh=S1K5Okfs30m-d-etXhpPTgQ=pb9+Xnr0DWZ5AXkqFKQ5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 17:35:54 +0530
From: Dixit Parmar <dixitparmar19@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] iio: magnetometer: add support for Infineon
TLV493D 3D Magentic sensor
> >>> +INFINEON TLV493D Driver
> >>> +M: Dixit Parmar <dixitparmar19@...il.com>
> >>> +L: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
> >>> +S: Maintained
> >>> +W: https://www.infineon.com/part/TLV493D-A1B6
> >>> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/magnetometer/infineon,tlv493d-a1b6.yaml
> >>
> >> There is no such file here. Apply this *patch* and check by yourself.
> > That file is being added as a separate patch(Patch 2/2) of this same
> > patch series. It's already reviewed by you only(based on the name).
>
> No. Read my comment again:
I am not sure If I understood what you exactly mean. Below is what I
understood, please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> "Apply this *patch* and check by yourself."
>
> It does not matter if you add the file later. The file does not exist
> now, here.
I have applied the patch on the latest mainline kernel codebase, it
gets applied successfully.
But yes, as you pointed out the
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/magnetometer/infineon,tlv493d-a1b6.yaml
file does not exist by applying JUST THIS patch. That is because that
file is introduced by a separate patch under the same
patch series mentioned below.
If this is not what you mean, I'd request to clarify to help me
understand your concern.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20250829-tlv493d-sensor-v6_16-rc5-v5-2-746e73bc6c11@gmail.com
> >>
> >> Your patchset is still incorrectly organized. See submitting patches in
> >> DT dir.
> > By "incorrectly organized" do you mean order of the patches in the
> > patchset or anything else?
>
> I pointed to the docs, is anything unclear in there?
I did referred the docs you
pointed(Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst), as
per that only one point which is
being missed here that is #5 _The Documentation/ portion of the patch
should come in the series before the code implementing the binding._
That is applicable to dt-bindings patch of this patch series as the
dt-bindings patch is a seperate patch.
Apart from that, is there anything you think this patch is missing,
kindly guide me.
Thank you for review,
Dixit
Powered by blists - more mailing lists